Blog

  • Photos of Note: Lufthansa’s first 747-8 takes flight

    Lufthansa Boeing 747-8I D-ABYA RC022

    Lufthansa Boeing 747-8I D-ABYA RC022

    Lufthansa Boeing 747-8I D-ABYA RC022

    EVERETT — Sometimes running late pays off. 
    I was zipping out the door this morning for the last day of the Pacific Northwest Aerospace Alliance conference in Lynnwood and running a few minutes late (as those who know me I am sometimes prone to be) when Lufthansa’s first 747-8 taxied into position on Runway 16R at Paine Field. 
    RC022 operating at Boeing 22, registered D-ABYA, did a quick rejected takeoff test turned around at the end of 16R and departed to the north a few minutes before 9 AM PT. 
    The aircraft is expected to be handed over to Lufthansa in March. 
    The full set of photos of D-ABYA’s first takeoff, which were shot through a barely cracked window of my hotel room, are below the fold.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Movie Tuesday – February 7 – Three Approaches, Three Perspectives

    SEATTLE — Movie Monday comes a day later than usual today and gives a unique look at some of the worlds most interesting approaches.
    The first video puts you in the flight deck of an A320 on approach to Paro, Bhutan’s capital city and widely believed to be the most difficult approach in the world. The runway, which sits at 7,300ft, is surrounded by 12,000ft peaks.
    The second video, which I shot in November, was filmed on the upper deck of an Air France A380. While it’s not a flight deck point of view, the IFE onboard allows multiple external views. I took advantage of both and tuned one screen to a forward view from the A380’s tail and the other to a straight-down view at the ground below. 
    After our turn final it became clear that there was a significant crosswind, and the superjumbo would crab into the wind. On the straight-down camera view, notice the offset angle of the markings on the runway as the A380 compensated for the perpendicular wind component.
    The third video, I shot from the jumpseat of an Embraer Lineage 1000 while on approach to Santos Dumont Airport in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. The views out the front of the modified Embraer 190 provided a look at the amazing terrain that defines Rio, including the city’s iconic Sugarloaf
    The Jeppesen charts for the Bhutan and Santos Dumont arrival, which should under no circumstance be used for actual flying, are available after the jump.
    All told, these three videos run about 17min. Enjoy!

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Airbus looks to offer 20in aisle seats for A320 family

    A320-20in-Aisle.JPG
    SEATTLE — There was a collective “why didn’t I think of that?” realization that dawned on the crowd at the Pacific Northwest Aerospace Alliance conference in Lynnwood, Washington this afternoon when Airbus said it was offering a 20in aisle seat to airlines for the A320 family.
    The goal is to use the 20in-wide seat as additional ancillary revenue opportunity (aka charge more) for the aisle seat in a six-abreast configuration. Some airlines charge for the aisle seat today, though the difference is that there’s no major product differentiation with the middle and window seats. Airbus said the width of the A320’s cabin allows for the 3in flexibility in the aisle seat in comparison to the other four seats at 17in.
    Varying the width of certain seats isn’t new for commercial cabins, Bombardier offers a 1in .5in wider middle seat on the CSeries to make the five-abreast 3-2 configuration more attractive to the 20% of customers who will end up in that seat.
    No word yet if any airlines have selected this for its A320 family aircraft.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Boeing inspects 787s after aft fuselage composite delamination

    Japan Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner ZA181

    Prepared for Flightglobal Pro
    Delamination prompts Boeing to inspect 787 fleet
    Jon Ostrower/Washington, D.C.
    Boeing again faces a manufacturing quality issue, requiring inspections and repairs of its 787 fleet.
    Structural stiffeners were found to be improperly joined to the composite skin in the aft sections of the aircraft, causing parts of the aircraft’s carbon fibre structure to delaminate, confirms the airframer.
    “Boeing has found that incorrect shimming was performed on support structure on the aft fuselage on certain airplanes in our facility in Everett, [Washington],” said the airframer.
    Flightglobal has confirmed there are at least three affected airframes, Airplanes 56, for All Nippon Airways, where the problem was first discovered, and Airplanes 57 and 58, the first two aircraft for Qatar Airways.
    Boeing declined to say how many 787s have this issue, though sources indicated that there are “significantly more” than the three initially identified in the factory.
    Programme sources say the stiffeners, or longerons that run along the length of the aircraft, are delaminating around the rear opening of the Section 48 section above and below the cutout known as the “bird’s mouth” that holds the Alenia Aeronautica-built horizontal stabiliser.
    Boeing said the issue is a “straightforward repair” and poses no “short-term safety concern” and the airframer said its inspections have revealed “delamination in some instances.”
    Boeing is currently conducting inspections on the already built 787s and those waiting to be assembled, at least 50 airframes, in Everett and its North Charleston, South Carolina facilities.
    “We have this condition well-defined and we are making progress on the repair plan,” said Boeing and declined to say if the inspections were slowing preparations for delivering additional 787s.
    The issue, identified around 24 January was traced to assembly of the aft fuselage by Boeing South Carolina, Formerly Vought Aircraft Industries, where Sections 47 and 48 are fabricated, assembled and stuffed with systems before being delivered to final assembly lines in North Charleston or Everett.
    When the longerons are installed on the wound carbon fibre barrel, frames and longerons are secured to the skin of the structure to give it strength. When natural variations in the fit of parts exists, aerospace mechanics will install shims, or spacers, which compensate for variations and wedge into structure to create a tighter fit.
    Without the shims, damage can be sustained to the composite when fasteners are installed by pulling the structure together, damaging the layers of carbon fibre.
    Over the long-term composite delamination can decrease the fatigue life of the aircraft’s structure.
    Boeing said it has “already taken appropriate steps to address this issue” in South Carolina, declining to elaborate on what steps it has taken.
    “We have already notified our early customers to ensure they are informed and aware of our plans to make repairs, should they be needed,” the company said.
    ANA, currently the sole operator of five 787s, said: “Currently we are not experiencing the issue; however, we are aware of this issue arising at the factory, and will take appropriate action when contacted by Boeing.”
    For the affected aircraft, Boeing said its “current plan”, which one programme source described as “tedious”, will not require the removal of the 787’s tail cone and horizontal stabiliser to fix the longerons, its initial remedy for aircraft in the factory, and it can “address this condition without removal of any major structural parts.”
    “Repairs, should they be needed, will be implemented in the most efficient manner possible,” said Boeing in order to maintain a design that conforms with its airworthiness certification standards.
    Boeing has faced manufacturing quality issues before, most notably the June 2010 inspection, teardown and reinstallation of many Alenia Aeronautica-built horizontal stabilisers after many were assembled without proper shimming creating gaps in the structure that threatened the fatigue life of the empennage.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • A touch of truth and humor for Everett’s most famous residents

    FlightBlogger image

    Submitted without comment. Levity courtesy of reader WingBender:

    Meet the Boeing family of wide body jetliners

    787:
    She is drop-dead gorgeous, she has all the “right” friends, and all the boys want to date her. She loves spending time at the spa, and she is addicted to social media. Predictably, she is a drama queen. Every little problem gets blown out of proportion, resulting in tears and tantrums. She has an attitude of entitlement, believing that everyone exists to serve her needs and desires. 

    767: He isn’t terribly smart, or good-looking, or popular, or talented. He is a little clumsy and socially awkward. Though he is a diligent and reliable worker, his only real option for the future is to go into the military, because frankly he has little prospect of finding employment in the private sector. But bless his heart, we love and adore him.

    777: He’s the family overachiever. Eagle Scout, 4.0 average, captain of the football team, scholarship offers flowing in, a gorgeous and smart girl friend. He wonders to himself how he could possibly be related to this cast of characters, and secretly wishes he weren’t.

    747: Quiet and studious, she tends to keep to herself. She’s a bit heavy and has a touch of asthma. She seems wise beyond her years, and is burdened by an unspoken sadness. Yet she is unfailingly loyal and will go to the wall for you. Others would do the same for her in an instant.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • ANA’s 787 faces bumpy service entry on Haneda-Frankfurt

    JA805A @ EDDF 01.02.2012

    ANA’s first 787 flights with JA801A and JA802A on domestic flights within Japan have been nearly flawless, with a 96.3% on time reliability during its first months of service. For JA805A, the first 158-seat 787 in long-haul international configuration, the introduction on the Tokyo-Haneda to Frankfurt route, the first long-haul service, has been anything but smooth.

    All Nippon Airways first long-haul international service with its Boeing 787 has faced a rocky start since 21 January with two of its ten flights operating between Tokyo-Haneda and Frankfurt, Germany cancelled due to technical issues with the new aircraft, the airline confirmed.

    ANA cancelled flight NH204 on 26 January and NH203 30 January. Other 787 flights to Germany operated on 21, 23, 26 and 28 January.

    The 26 January service was cancelled in Frankfurt when the aircraft’s flap system failed, while the 30 January cancellation in Haneda was due to “a temporary failure of the computer software which monitors and controls the aircraft”, said ANA, adding “the aircraft has been repaired by replacing the computer’s concerned parts and loading software.”

    Of the five 787 deliveries to ANA, JA805A, Airplane 31, delivered on December 30, is operating exclusively on the airline’s long-range international flights.


    Photo Credit Carsten Gurk

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • A Closer Look: Transitioning to the next generation 777 and A340

    Building on last Friday’s post about unlocking customers to evaluate competing airframer’s products, I wanted to look a bit closer at the changes Airbus and Boeing made to develop their respective second generation 777s and A340s. For Boeing, the aircraft maker would evolve the 777-200ER and -300 into the the 777-300ER, -200LR and freighter, while Airbus would take its A340-300 and -200 to become the A340-600 and -500. 

    I went digging into the Flight International archive to find the technical evolution of each model and the structural changes that were required from their respective baseline designs. The changes to create the longer range A340s were significantly more extensive with its stretched wingbox, fuselage and revised empennage
    With its raised main landing gear, raked wingtip extensions and structural strengthening, the 777, by comparison did not need a fuselage stretch as the original 777-200 and -300 established the airframes for the -200LR and -300ER.
    October 1996 – A340-500/600 soft launch
    1996-October-A340.jpg

    March 1997 – 777-200X/300X launch
    1997-March-777.jpg
    Additional details of the 777 and A340’s evolution are below the fold.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • News Analysis: Norwegian order points to unlocked 737 market

    NAS-737-Max-Winglet_560.jpg
    To date, Airbus and Boeing have split three of the five announced 737 Max customers: American Airlines, Aviation Capital Group and now Norwegian Air Shuttle.
     
    Norwegian’s order for 100 737-8s is a big boost for the re-engined jet as it grows its firm backlog and hardly a surprise as the northern European airline is one of Boeing’s stalwart narrowbody customers. Though accompanying that order were 100 more Airbus A320neos.
    Fundamentally the “minimum change” Max is a derivative development from today’s Next Generation 737, just as the Next Generation family was a derivative of the 737 Classic. With 75% non-commonality, the 737-600, -700, -800 and -900 unlocked the Classic’s customers to consider the A320. 
    The consequence of Boeing’s changes to the 737; a new tail cone, widespread structural re-gauging, engine development and a raised nose gear make the Max a manageable, yet expensive (which Boeing disputes), undertaking, concluded Bernstein Research in a report earlier this week. But the result, as illustrated by Norwegian’s A320neo order, may also be an unlocked 737 market for Airbus and Boeing to fight over.
    Photo Credit Boeing & Airbus

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • American unveils 777-300ER with Sky Interior elements

    AA-777-300ER-Archway.jpg
    With its 1,000th unit coming down the line for Emirates, Boeing’s 777 continues to evolve from its earliest incarnations. The latest interior catalog offerings, now selected by American Airlines, include a 787 and 737-style Sky Interior LED-lit entryway for its 777-300ERs, which enter the fleet in December. Long-time Boeing interior design firm Teague was believed to have been working on this feature for a while now.
    The features of its 777 were hinted about last year when, just days after its bankruptcy filing, the carrier announced what would be aboard its new twin. 

    Arranged in a three-class cabin configuration, the new 777-300ER will provide the airline with more passenger and cargo capacity than any other aircraft in its fleet today. Customers will be welcomed into the aircraft by unique mood lighting. American will be the first carrier to use a dramatic archway and ceiling treatment on the 777-300 to create a feeling of spaciousness.

    At that point, American’s news release did not include any images or additional details about the interior. Whether the Sky Interior-inspired lighting will run the length of the 777 isn’t clear from the photos release by the airline. Further, the carrier appears to be an early customer for the formerly branded Panasonic Fusion in-flight entertainment system, now known as the Integrated Smart Monitor, a photo of which is below the fold.
    Additional photos of its business and first class seating are available on American’s Facebook page.
    UPDATE 3:46 PM ET: While Boeing and American have focused on upgrades to evolve the 777’s interior, the company has been finding ways to improve the environmental efficiency of building and delivering each aircraft. While environmental efficiency is the banner under which 10 improvements have been made to the manufacturing process, the bottom line is how to reduce the cost to build each 777 through continuously improving and optimizing its processes.
    Photo Credit American Airlines

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Aircraft Design 101: What’s trust got to do with it?

    Royal Air Maroc Boeing 787 Dreamliner ZA151

    As we approach Wendesday’s Boeing full year 2011 and quarterly earnings report, which is sure to be filled with questions of the pace of 787 and 747-8 deliveries and production ramp up, the burden of travelled work and change incorporation has been the central theme of aircraft development over the past decade. 

    I’ve recently started reading a new book called Smart Trust, by Stephen Covey and Greg Link, recommended to me by a colleague. It explores the role of trust in creating a prosperous, more energetic and happier organization, whether in microfinance in developing nations, the actions of governments and its citizenry or the relationships between customers and suppliers. 
    I’m still early on in the book, but one quote jumped out at me. While it wasn’t referring specifically to aerospace and aircraft development, this paragraph captured the connection directly:

    When trust goes down in a relationship, on a team, in an organization, or in a country, speed goes down and cost goes up. Why? Because of the many steps that have to be taken to compensate for the lack of trust. This is a tax-a low-trust tax. Everything takes more time, and miscommunication, redundancy, and rework create costly delays.

    To look at the recent history of Airbus A380’s wiring woes, the 787’s supply chain, the lessons of both are seen in the A350 and CSeries programs, both working to position themselves to avoid similar pains. But was the prevalence of traveled work the root cause of the delays to these aircraft programs or just a symptom of something much deeper both between customer and supplier and within an organization?

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.